Don't Be Conned

There is much evidence from independent observers in the White House that Senator Clinton was NOT a supporter of NAFTA within the Clinton administration. And biographers, i.e. Carl Bernstein and Sally Bedell Smith, who have never been partial or particularly friendly to Hillary Clinton, have nevertheless reported that she was, in matter of fact, critical of NAFTA. Yet, it the Obama campaign which never fails to fallaciously make the charge that Hillary supported NAFTA. It is just another in a long list of lies from the Obama campaign and Barack Obama. They have yet to meet a fact they liked nor to tell the truth. Why their backers and the press finds them credible, if at all, is because of their failure to do their job and their dislike for the Clintons in spite of the advantages enjoyed by practically everyone, which I presume included them as well, under the last Clinton presidency.

Obama and the media will take an incident like Hillary's comments about her visit to Bosnia and the video will be disseminated and shown on U-Tube and national television, and they will say, look at this. She is as safe as safe can be. No it wasn't the safest place to be. She arrived in a Black Hawk helicopter. There were sharpshooters with her to watch out for snipers. The country was not safe - yet it was her choice she to visit to extend the good wishes of the Clinton Administration and thank the troops there for their job. She was warned it could be dangerous. Nevertheless, she misspoke by saying she ran across the tarmac. Well, let me tell you, I too, have been in war zones and there was plenty of danger even though I didn't have to duck and cover. I did have to observe a black out at night though. No one ever knows when some sniper will shoot at you in war. Even not in war there are opportunistic targets. Hillary would have been a potential opportunistic target. It was war. And she was the first First Lady to visit a war zone since Eleanor Roosevelt and to my knowledge, she has been the last. It was courageous for her to visit Bosnia with Chelsie to thank the soldiers. It does not deserve the disparagement she has been getting from the press and from the Obama campaign.

Obama constantly disrespects the Clinton Administration preferring the transformative Reaganomics to the improvements with Clintonomics which created 22 million new jobs. It is a stretch to think this do-nothing freshman Senator from Illinois can impute the character of one of the most successful Democratic presidents since FDR and get away with it with impunity.

Wake Up!

It is a new day and we don't have to give the black man a pass.
and don't call me a racist for stating what is obvious and what is true.

Senator Clinton has a plan for health care which is affordable. It invests $110 billion and provides generous tax subsidies and generous tax credits to guarantee it will be affordable for everyone.

Obama did not make it a requirement that everyone is insured so everyone will not be insured under his plan. How do you make it possible so everyone can have insurance? You do as Hillary Clinton has proposed, by putting a cap on the premium they must pay - as a percentage of a person's income so NO ONE pays more than a certain amount pursuant to what they make and what they can afford. And for those who still can't afford insurance, it is guaranteed that they will qualify too with subsidies for them. The government can do it if there is the will to provide care for everyone - and it should be.

Obama's plan is only a mandate to insure children. They're important but so are their parents. Her plan is for a universal health care system. His plan is for a band-aid on the system we already have. His contributions come from the very companies who might have to cut their profits and they couldn't have that, could they? Obama is no progressive. The young people foolish enough to fall for the charismatic Barack Obama, who drool over his picture on Facebook and MySpace better wake up to the fact that he is not them. He lives in a $1.6 million mansion and never had to go without. He is not one of those poor blacks who affirmative action was meant to give a leg up. His leg was all the way up already. He is a privileged black man.

The Obama plan, he says will cost $65 billion. Hers will take $110 billion. Well what does it cost to have a war? The extra investment ensures affordability. Because she wants to insure EVERYONE.

The Obama plan is not a good plan but does not stop the Obama attack machine against Hillary Clinton. Then there are the Republicans who call it socialism.

Obama's entire campaign has been negative

Obama has been untruthful. He has said she will do or say anything to get elected while he makes accusations which are not true and attacked her character. He has been divisive because he knows he can be and get away with it. He has a pass. I didn't give it to him - the press and liberals and so-called "progressives" have.

Obama should be ashamed (and would be if he was honest) and so should his liberal groupies who attack Hillary Clinton's veracity and her credibility and her sincere dedication to service, and not to be alarmist or anything, but if the Israel hating, white hating, America hating Rev Wright didn't get to you and Osama bin-Laden sitting in his cave somewhere and laughing because after all the smears and defamation of Clinton's character, there may be a Hussein in the White House and if that doesn't get in your craw nothing will because you have been conned and we're in for a very bad time.

Hank Roth

All (if any) quoting per the Fair Use Doctrine
for educational and discussion purposes pursuant to
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, Copyright Law.

Don't be conned by Barack Obama.
Where is the "change" we can believe in?
|

Permalink: http://inyourface.info/ArT/Alpha/CoN.shtml

Today is Friday March 12, 2010